width or depth ?

[ripped128806 Member Find all posts View Profile Close ripped128806]

just curious about this.ive really got no depth but im all width and my girth is 5.75.what are most guys width or depth?

[ColtAR-15 Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close ColtAR-15]

Judging by this place it seems to be width (girth). It seems 5.5 girth is the average here. My girth sucks.

[NP97 Retired ModeratorPEGym Hero Find all posts View Profile Close NP97]

Use to be much more width.
WAY more even now.

[GTO Retired ModeratorPEGym EditorPEGym Hero Find all posts View Profile Close GTO]

Slightly more depth than width - going for cylindrical.

[rbi99 Retired Moderator Member of the Month Nov 2017PEGym Hero Find all posts View Profile Close rbi99]

When we talk about width and depth, are we talking about width = CC's, and depth = CS? If so, the problem (if you want to call it that) with CS development is that a well developed CS sticks out very pronouncedly, whereas well developed CC's are incorporated into the erect shaft smoothly. My CS is very well developed and because of that it does not make my unit look cylindrical at all. I would think if one is after a cylindrical "look", a less developed CS would be in order.

[mystic wolf Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close mystic wolf]

just curious about this.ive really got no depth but im all width and my girth is 5.75.what are most guys width or depth?

so what's your width measured with a caliper please?

[vacuumsalesmilkman Member Find all posts View Profile Close vacuumsalesmilkman]

Some thoughts on CS development in my post bellow. Since this thread is about penis shape it seems appropriate.
Gonna add the importance in v jelqs for this is key!
https://www.pegym.com/forums/penis-e...your-cock.html

[gsd Member Find all posts View Profile Close gsd]

Man, I have a well developed depth and only 4" girth. My width really suck.
Adding O-bend to routine now ...

[rbi99 Retired Moderator Member of the Month Nov 2017PEGym Hero Find all posts View Profile Close rbi99]

Some thoughts on CS development in my post bellow. Since this thread is about penis shape it seems appropriate.
Gonna add the importance in v jelqs for this is key!
https://www.pegym.com/forums/penis-e...your-cock.html

Since V jelqs hit the sides of your unit (CC's) more so than than the bottom of it (CS), regular jelqs or UJ's will do more to develop a pronounced CS than V's will.

[JB1977 Junior Member Find all posts View Profile Close JB1977]

width, my girth is 6.5" MS

[BigO AdministratorPEGym Hero Find all posts View Profile Close BigO]

I have more width than depth but not to much, pretty close to a tube shape but Im not interested in changing it yet.

[kublakhan Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close kublakhan]

Depth. Looks a bit thin from my view above!

From my time here it seems that a better looking width is a shade more common.

Rbi, what are your thoughts on tackling the CCs? Compared to the rest of me they seem tough as old boots! I've recently added a few of your UVJs to my routine (5 for every 20 regular V's) but am taking it slow as a precaution... so thanks so far!! Any thoughts on the matter in general? Cheers,

KK

[ColtAR-15 Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close ColtAR-15]

Oh. I totally mis-interpreted the question. I have more width than depth. Both suck though considering this crowd.https://www.pegym.com/forums/images/icons/icon9.gif


MEG 5"https://www.pegym.com/forums/images/icons/icon13.gif
BEG 5.3"
MID WIDTH 1 5/8" maybe slightly wider
BASE WIDTH 1 3/4"

[acewondersx Member Find all posts View Profile Close acewondersx]

most of my girth seems to come from my CS, so depth for me

[Going411x7 Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Going411x7]

Depth for me too. My width at the base is 2.25" but my depth there is closer to 3".