Circumcision & Girth

[Zyxciz Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Zyxciz]

<new thread extracted from the condom thread, Admin>

Also, this is somewhat off topic but if you had to take a guess, how much girth do you lose by circumcision?

[Cavalier Retired Super Moderator Member of the Month Feb 2015PEGym Hero Find all posts View Profile Close Cavalier]

Also, this is somewhat off topic but if you had to take a guess, how much girth do you lose by circumcision?

None. Circumcision only removes the foreskin. Why do you think circumcision would reduce girth?

[Zyxciz Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Zyxciz]

None. Circumcision only removes the foreskin. Why do you think circumcision would reduce girth?

I don't know, isn't the foreskin like extra skin on the shaft that gets removed? So doesn't less skin equal less girth?

[Zyxciz Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Zyxciz]

Circumcision makes my blood crawl.


I would think could wear a 52mm fine now.

Tell me about it, I was circumcised and I wish I hadn't been

[Shamany Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Shamany]

Tell me about it, I was circumcised and I wish I hadn't been

Why?!

[Shamany Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Shamany]

I'm circumcised and doctors say better because it reduces viruses...infections to the minimum.

[RedWilly Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close RedWilly]

None. Circumcision only removes the foreskin. Why do you think circumcision would reduce girth?

Off topic:

If you’re removing skin around the penis of course you’d lose girth. By definition. How much would probably vary between how big or small or foreskin that persons was but removing something from your penis is going to make it smaller.

[Shamany Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Shamany]

Off topic:

If you’re removing skin around the penis of course you’d lose girth. By definition. How much would probably vary between how big or small or foreskin that persons was but removing something from your penis is going to make it smaller.

If this is right then my girth goal could had been achieved naturally if my parents didn't do this bloody mistaken.

Thinking of sueing them tomorrow morning😁

[Zyxciz Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Zyxciz]

Why?!

The foreskin has the most sensitive nerves of the penis and thus sensitivity is reduced after its removal. Although someone who is curcmcised doesn't know the difference in sensitivty because they can't compare it to the feeling of having foreskin. Moreover, the uncircumcised penis is supposed to feel better for the woman. As a result of chafing, the glans of the circumcised man is more rough than that of an uncircumcised one. If the foreskin is intact, it will protect the glans and help keep it soft as well as create moisture which will serve as a natural lubricant during intercourse. Therefore, uncircumcised men require less use of lubricants during sex as opposed to those who are circumcised. Other ways a woman experiences more satisfaction is when the foreskin bunches up on the penis and in turn "fills up" the woman more so to speak. Also, the foreskin is moved back and fourth during penetration which creates more friction and in turn more pleasure for the woman.

When it comes to reducing the risk of infections, the use of condoms is much more effective at that than removing the foreskin. Personally, it makes no sense to me why you'd remove the foreskin when we have condoms readily available. Also, we have access to sanitation and we can easily clean the uncircumcised penis. Maybe the argument for circumcision is passable if you live in a third world country, but it's completely unneccesary if you live in a developed country.

Speaking from personal experience, I would experience pain during erections when I was younger. Think about that for a second, pain during arousal is completely unnatural and the only reason it happened is because the erect penis has less skin to help it expand. Thankfully, the problem has become less of an issue now that I'm older but it was still extremely uncomfortable at times.

Finally, it's also a moral issue. What give the parents the right to cut off the top of the penis? The baby should have a say in the matter. That's why I say there's no problem if you decide to become circumcised as you get older. However, it's immoral for the parents to make that decision unilaterally.

Also, does it make sense that gods' creations need fixing by cutting off their body parts? Of course not, we are created in his image and it's simply an abhorrent tradition that needs to die!

[RedWilly Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close RedWilly]

If this is right then my girth goal could had been achieved naturally if my parents didn't do this bloody mistaken.

Thinking of sueing them tomorrow morning

I'd go so far to say it's probably at most .2 inches if you bunch it up at the bottom of the base. But I've confirmed with multiple women that yes, it does indeed make a difference and all other things being the same it would "feel" like it's bigger, and I'm sure it would look it too.

This is just casual talking though, nothing scientific.

[Zyxciz Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Zyxciz]

Um guys start your own thread this is about condoms.

There has been a hostile takeover of the condom thread.

[Zyxciz Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Zyxciz]

Thought on circumcision

The foreskin has the most sensitive nerves of the penis and thus sensitivity is reduced after its removal. Although someone who is curcmcised doesn't know the difference in sensitivty because they can't compare it to the feeling of having foreskin. Moreover, the uncircumcised penis is supposed to feel better for the woman. As a result of chafing, the glans of the circumcised man is more rough than that of an uncircumcised one. If the foreskin is intact, it will protect the glans and help keep it soft as well as create moisture which will serve as a natural lubricant during intercourse. Therefore, uncircumcised men require less use of lubricants during sex as opposed to those who are circumcised. Other ways a woman experiences more satisfaction is when the foreskin bunches up on the penis and in turn "fills up" the woman more so to speak. Also, the foreskin is moved back and fourth during penetration which creates more friction and in turn more pleasure for the woman.

When it comes to reducing the risk of infections, the use of condoms is much more effective at that than removing the foreskin. Personally, it makes no sense to me why you'd remove the foreskin when we have condoms readily available. Also, we have access to sanitation and we can easily clean the uncircumcised penis. Maybe the argument for circumcision is passable if you live in a third world country, but it's completely unneccesary if you live in a developed country.

Speaking from personal experience, I would experience pain during erections when I was younger. Pain during arousal is completely unnatural and the only reason it happened is because the erect penis has less skin to help it expand. Thankfully, the problem has become less of an issue now that I'm older but it was still extremely uncomfortable at times.

Finally, it's also a moral issue. What give the parents the right to cut off the top of the penis? The baby should have a say in the matter. That's why I say there's no problem if you decide to become circumcised as you get older. However, it's immoral for the parents to make that decision unilaterally.

Also, does it make sense that gods' creations need fixing by cutting off their body parts? Of course not, we are created in his image. Circumcision is an abhorrent tradition that needs to die!

[Shamany Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Shamany]

Before "Pegasus" kick us out! Will say:

You only lose the foreskin(that is only covering the head of penis), that means a small portion of whole penis skin, if doctor is really good/professional and do not go more down or fuck up something! So that possibly 0.2 inch must be from penis head only.

What did multiple women confirm?!

It is proven that a circumcised man can last longer in bed(not that big difference, you must work on yourself anyways, still..), and prevents viruses esp. much lowering infections possibility like HiV.

About parents, some do it for religious reasons, but many doctors cheer most parents to do it because of preventing infections...etc and they save their sons the weird feeling doing it when adult, better done when baby, although there is a point of view here about giving him the choice..anyways what had been done, can not be reversed

I disagree about wearing a condom is simply the solution for uncircumcised men as you forgot that without condom the sensations/sensitivity is much better which turns it to circumcised men favor.

Other than that the circumcised penis looks much more attractive to the eye(women's)

[Vitex Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Vitex]

To my horror, I've even read that most doctors don't even use anesthesia before doing it just because of how long it'll take. People argue too "well the baby won't remember it." The body actually always *unconsciously* remembers pain in such an extremity that it could lead to later problems in life like chronic anxiety, stress, depression, and whatnot.

[Dangler Senior Administrator☼ Wizard ☼ White Tiger Award 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Dangler]

There has been a hostile takeover of the condom thread.

posts used in the attempted hi-jack of the condom thread have been apprehended and confined in this thread.