Study nbpel vs bpel.

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

Here are 3 studies, I thought a conparison would be of interest .

Study	Mean	Standard Deviation	Largest 10%
Schneider et al. 2001	5.7 inches 14.5cm	0.79 inches 2.0cm	> 6.7 inches 17.0cm
Ansell 2001	5.88 inches 14.9cm	0.83 inches 2.1cm	> 6.9 inches 17.6cm
Wessells et al. 1996	5.07 inches 12.9cm	1.15 inches 2.9cm	> 6.5 inches 16.6cm The Wessels study is a little unusual in that it seems to be nbpel. Note the greater varation/standdard deviation which I take it is caused by difficulty geting accuracy with nbpel measures and also the smaller length. The difference is .7in roughly which indicates a typicall fat pad.

[Grim Reaper Banned Find all posts View Profile Close Grim Reaper]

looks like the minimum average is increasing, all these are from over a decade ago, maybe this year the average is 7 nbpel x 5.25 eg.

[Jay1983 Senior MemberMember of the Month Apr 2014, Sept 2016 Find all posts View Profile Close Jay1983]

looks like the minimum average is increasing, all these are from over a decade ago, maybe this year the average is 7 nbpel x 5.25 eg.

Hey! Don't say that! lol

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

looks like the minimum average is increasing, all these are from over a decade ago, maybe this year the average is 7 nbpel x 5.25 eg.

Huh there is no evidence of any size increase in the last 1000 years .
The earliest study I know of shows a longer bpel, 6,1 in bpel from memory, but as it was self measured it is thought this accounts for the difference . In any case this would mean penises are shrinking in the last few decades if anything.

[Virom Banned Find all posts View Profile Close Virom]

There has been size increase in the last 1000 years.

[Jay1983 Senior MemberMember of the Month Apr 2014, Sept 2016 Find all posts View Profile Close Jay1983]

There has been size increase in the last 1000 years.

Yeah, with PE.

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

looks like the minimum average is increasing, all these are from over a decade ago, maybe this year the average is 7 nbpel x 5.25 eg.

The difference between the Wessels study and the others is the difference between nbpel and bpel.

[Grim Reaper Banned Find all posts View Profile Close Grim Reaper]

Huh there is no evidence of any size increase in the last 1000 years .
The earliest study I know of shows a longer bpel, 6,1 in bpel from memory, but as it was self measured it is thought this accounts for the difference . In any case this would mean penises are shrinking in the last few decades if anything.

The difference between the Wessels study and the others is the difference between nbpel and bpel.

oh i misinterpreted it, thanks for clearing it up for me.

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

Welcome .
I thought this might be of interest, because it shows the difference between nbpel and bpel studies .
Nbpel studies are rare ,gain note the shorter el and greater varability.

[not2big Senior Super ModeratorPEGym Hero Find all posts View Profile Close not2big]

The Wessels study was conducted among guys who had perceived their penises small and were applying to have their dicks surgically increased. Accordingly, the average size of their dicks came out shorter than studies conducted among the general population.

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

The Wessels study was conducted among guys who had perceived their penises small and were applying to have their dicks surgically increased. Accordingly, the average size of their dicks came out shorter than studies conducted among the general population.

Actually NO.
If you read ,you will see it was conducated to provide noramitive data, that is data on what is normal.
The subjects were a normal group.

[dhusky Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close dhusky]

I thought that the second study Ansell (2001) was also non bone pressed because in the literature it said that length was measured from the penile-pubo skin junction which in my opinion indicate a non bone pressed length.

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

There is some argument aboout that, but if you compare to an actual nbpel study you will see the difference .
The Wessels study has greater variability and notably shorter length.