Here is another idea I had proposed to remek in a PM and wanted to throw out here for discussion.
One of the first things new guys ask is "Are gains permanent?" Then we give them the spiel about "cementing" which basically we have understood to mean, keep exercising the tissue until the gains become permanent. I don't know if anyone has ever questioned or examined why cementing works and what exactly happens to the tissue that keeps gains from disappearing. It may be noted, that even after seriously "cementing" gains, some guys still loose a little if they stop PE completely. So, that being said, we can conclude that some type of atrophy or shrinkage takes places after stopping PE exercises. What causes this shrinkage?
Logically, if the body is forced to adapt due to exposure to a new stimulus, such as stress, and this stimulus is removed, the tendency is for it to want to return to the previous state before it was forced to adapt. This has been shown in many other areas (i.e. bodybuilding.) It has been theorized in this thread that if you stop PEing the smooth muscle in the penis might atrophy causing a loss of gains. This is valid reasoning. Scientific data supports the notion that smooth muscle can atrophy. SO - Likewise, could it be that if you made some good length gains and didn't work to fill the extra tunica space with SM; then stopped PEing, the tunica, lacking sufficient internal pressure to remain stretched out, could also atrophy back to the threshold of where the SM pressure is? This is assuming that the tunica has not been completely restructured by plastic deformation and that there is sufficient elastin remaining in the tunica to recoil it. On the other hand, if you stretched out the tunica and then develeoped the necessary smooth muscle to "fill in the gap" the added SM tissue could prevent the complete atrophy of the tunica?
If the SM can atrophy, why not the tunica? This could also help explain why lost gains return quickly? It could also help explain why EQ quality improves during a break - an "equalizing" of the tissues takes place. Meaning if the tunica is stretched beyond the capacity for SM to fill it, erections would be soft and weak. During a break tunica atrophy could reduce the excess space and improved erection quality?
Thoughts?
One of the first things new guys ask is "Are gains permanent?" Then we give them the spiel about "cementing" which basically we have understood to mean, keep exercising the tissue until the gains become permanent. I don't know if anyone has ever questioned or examined why cementing works and what exactly happens to the tissue that keeps gains from disappearing. It may be noted, that even after seriously "cementing" gains, some guys still loose a little if they stop PE completely. So, that being said, we can conclude that some type of atrophy or shrinkage takes places after stopping PE exercises. What causes this shrinkage?
Logically, if the body is forced to adapt due to exposure to a new stimulus, such as stress, and this stimulus is removed, the tendency is for it to want to return to the previous state before it was forced to adapt. This has been shown in many other areas (i.e. bodybuilding.) It has been theorized in this thread that if you stop PEing the smooth muscle in the penis might atrophy causing a loss of gains. This is valid reasoning. Scientific data supports the notion that smooth muscle can atrophy. SO - Likewise, could it be that if you made some good length gains and didn't work to fill the extra tunica space with SM; then stopped PEing, the tunica, lacking sufficient internal pressure to remain stretched out, could also atrophy back to the threshold of where the SM pressure is? This is assuming that the tunica has not been completely restructured by plastic deformation and that there is sufficient elastin remaining in the tunica to recoil it. On the other hand, if you stretched out the tunica and then develeoped the necessary smooth muscle to "fill in the gap" the added SM tissue could prevent the complete atrophy of the tunica?
If the SM can atrophy, why not the tunica? This could also help explain why lost gains return quickly? It could also help explain why EQ quality improves during a break - an "equalizing" of the tissues takes place. Meaning if the tunica is stretched beyond the capacity for SM to fill it, erections would be soft and weak. During a break tunica atrophy could reduce the excess space and improved erection quality?
Thoughts?
Comment