Evolution and Penis Size

[DaddyDick Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close DaddyDick]

Evolution takes a genetic line and moves it forward in a new direction. The line of primates that led to ourselves and chimps also led to countless other species most of which have become extinct. The idea there is a never ending succession of species coming up the proverbial path behind the "most evolved" species is false.

Homo sapiens had several close relatives but all of them have gone extinct in the not so distant past including a recently discovered pygmy species Australopithecus floresiensis. Human evolution is pretty neat stuff with lots of holes and mysteries but genetics is bringing a lot of new information to light.

All non-African humans possess some Neanderthal DNA which is pretty cool in my opinion. People say that Neanderthals died out but clearly that isn't the case; most died out but some were assimilated into contemporary humanity as various radiations of humanoid apes migrated from Africa during the past 100,000 years or so. Some scientists think that red hair is a Neanderthal trait!

Perfect example of evolution-I have auburn hair. Evolution is random.

[Girth5 Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Girth5]

>>>Holy crap, am I replying to another bigger is better thread

I'm surprised since we are discussing this on a forum dedicated to penis enlargement, right? I don't think bigger-is-better is correct...a 14" dick is probably only helpful if you're into bovines. The record holder is about that big and I would thank God every day I am not him, I feel sorry for him.

In what way do you feel "sorry" for him as him ( jonah falcon)

[tanaka Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close tanaka]

Dude, his dick is far too big to be of any use! What woman is gonna let him pound her pussy with that? The only thing this guy can screw is a cow, or maybe some big guy's ass. IIRC it's like 13.5x9. He gets bragging rights and no sex.

[Ivor Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Ivor]

Big tits are no better for feeding babies than small ones. Milk glands are actually pretty small, most of the volume of a boob is fat. Of course a decent amount of body fat is healthy for a woman who's expecting a baby, but I'm sure we all know by now that too much is a bad thing.

The females of other primates don't have big rounded boobs like human women do. Human boobs are thought to have evolved to mimic the shape of buttocks.

Sorry if this has been gone over, I haven't read the whole thread.

[tanaka Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close tanaka]

I've read the larger, bulging breasts ARE an advantage because human babies have a relatively flat face compared to other mammals.

[Ivor Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Ivor]

I'm not sure I entirely follow your argument. I don't think huge breasts are going to be any easier for a baby to feed from than smaller ones - in fact ridiculously big tits would probably make it more difficult.

In any case, all women's breasts get bigger during pregnancy and breastfeeding, so even a woman who's normally quite flat-chested will have some amount of boobage.

[DaddyDick Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close DaddyDick]

I'm not sure I entirely follow your argument. I don't think huge breasts are going to be any easier for a baby to feed from than smaller ones - in fact ridiculously big tits would probably make it more difficult.

In any case, all women's breasts get bigger during pregnancy and breastfeeding, so even a woman who's normally quite flat-chested will have some amount of boobage.

Large boobs equal lots of food for kiddies. Now, nipples are where the concern should be.

Babies have small mouths and if a mothers nipples are too large, she may not be able to breast feed the child. No food for junior means junior dies.

This would be the end of the super huge nipples trait. Perfect example of evolution.

[Ivor Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Ivor]

Sure, breasts that are in any way not well adapted to feeding babies are going to be selected out of the gene pool, obviously. I was just pointing out that 'huge tits = great evolutionary advantage' doesn't really hold water. I mean, east-Asian women tend to be slimmer and slighter than most European or African women, for example, and generally have smaller breasts. Now look at the population of China. Clearly, there is no evolutionary disadvantage in having the kind of body shape Chinese women have!

[Jm123 Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Jm123]

From my understanding there are few things going on here. First, would be monogamy which by current stats place about 60% of women as being faithful (open to being corrected on that number); considering that penis size would be irrelevant. Next, penis size concerning evolution would be a function of successful procreation and not women's pleasure. Considering that the length should correlate to being as close to cervix as possible, and possibly a little deeper, the average would appear to meet this. Considering girth larger equals more pleasure, but also means more baby batter leaking out when the woman is recovering. Now the above is not an intense analysis, but just some commonsense observations.

[tanaka Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close tanaka]

Considering girth larger equals more pleasure, but also means more baby batter leaking out when the woman is recovering.

Well, I've observed that after orgasm the vagina seems to tighten, perhaps to keep the "batter" in place(?).

Concerning Asians and small breasts. Or small breasts in general. I think such a trait isn't fatal, genetically. Larger breasts may offer an advantage, enough to nudge the distribution in some populations, but not enough to eliminate the smaller endowed females. No question, some men prefer smaller breasts. Some men prefer breasts no matter what size. (I am one.) But are there women that prefer small penises? Or just don't care at all.

Another factor may be this: females are virtually guaranteed reproduction, males are not. There are some males that can only get sex using force. Generally this is not true of women. This may have interesting consequences from an evolutionary perspective.

[Boosie Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Boosie]

If Genghis khan had a small penis that would explain why asians are generally not hung

[Ivor Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Ivor]

If Genghis khan had a small penis that would explain why asians are generally not hung

Might have had something to do with his temper, too...

[Trigger Junior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Trigger]

This thread is funny. From a Nature stand point we are here to procreate. Our genitals are just fine as a previous poster pointed out about the 7 Billion on the planet.
Should they need to be longer to breed, the longer ones will evolve and the short penis' gene pool will fade away.

This long penis / short penis is a Society thing. If we all had 12 " penis' but 1 in 20 had an 18" penis, I would feel small, and will all would be here doing what we are doing now. lol



PS.. During the Roman Empire, Small penis's were in, Large Penis were frowned upon as less masculine or virtous etc..

[DaddyDick Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close DaddyDick]

PS.. During the Roman Empire, Small penis's were in, Large Penis were frowned upon as less masculine or virtous etc..

Except for the smart ones

[Sonny747 Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Sonny747]

From an evolutionary standpoint I am not positive that the woman's pleasure mattered much. You raided a village, stole the women and raped them. I doubt that any of the raiders said "Was it good for you honey"???

Also, if you had a huge penis it could get in the way during battle and physical activities. It could even get cut off. Maybe that's why we turtle during intense exercise. It's "rollup"