I propose a new term

[imac Retired Moderator Member of the Month Nov 12PEGym Hero Find all posts View Profile Close imac]

I vote E%. It just looks better.

[TheSperminator Member of the Month Oct 12 Find all posts View Profile Close TheSperminator]

I also vote for E%. Thanks to the "%"-symbol everyone will get what you mean .. EP still can cause questions like what does the "P" stands for? .. + when you say EP 80 .. doesn't make sense to me.. E% 80 is better in my opinion.

when you use EP 80% this wouldn't make sense at all because you know how to type the "%"

So: E% for me

[BTBrian Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close BTBrian]

I like E% too

[CollegeImprovements Member Find all posts View Profile Close CollegeImprovements]

I like E% as well, but i do think that it would be more appropriate to use a lower case "e" to distinguish "engourgement"

[ThirdArm Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close ThirdArm]

Aye, I'm leaning towards e% myself (lower case), but can't avoid Padawan's true observation about it being more challenging to type - especailly for anyone typing on a phone.

[not2big Senior Super ModeratorPEGym Hero Find all posts View Profile Close not2big]

I hate to be a party pooper, but I have no problem with the term EQ to describe the quality of my erection. The percentage of EQ is a modifier of the quality. At 100 % I am at full hard fucking quality erection status. At 50 % I am at a nice semi erect status great for jelqing. Below 50% I am at various limp stages, depending on the %. Since I have ED, 0 to 20% describes my usual "erection" status without medication. With Viagra, I can sometimes achieve a 75% EQ. If I need a 90 - 100% erection I need a Trimix injection.

Since most of the other PE and ED forums use EQ, it would make it confusing if the Gym were to start using a different terminology such as an E %. To my mind, the % indicates the hardness of me penis.

[ThirdArm Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close ThirdArm]

Aye. The moderator silence leads me to believe that this is the consensus.

Not a problem. I don't want to cause confusion by introducing a new term - I just thought it might add clarity for some.

I'll deal with 'EQ' for now. It's not perfect, but "perfect is the enemy of good," one famous philosopher once said.

[pterodactyl Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close pterodactyl]

e%