Member of the Month June 2017
Tweet
The possibility of naturally enlarging the penis by PEing is not put out to the general public in a way that triggers a serious response. Yes, occasionally a documentary is made, which includes a person that tests out some penis elongation technique, like jelqing. These documentary programs are mostly made in a teen-like way with a certain giggle-factor. I remember the first time I saw jelqing in a documentary: The jelqing part was put between some freaky penis fetishes. (Like this guy who filled his penis and scrotum with huge amounts of silicone.) Alas, jelqing was also silently labeled a fetish. And the guy that was interviewed regarding jelqing took out his penis and stretched it a bit, and he said on the documentary that he had his own site where people could log in and pay for his improved teqniques. Like the other people on that program, this man also seemed a bit spaced out, and then the program didn't exactly become a good advertisement for PEing.
And Andropenis wrote in their scientific report that although they expected that erect length also had increased in the test subjects, they hadn't scientifically measured erect length as it was difficult to obtain good erections under a clinical environment. If they should include erect length, they would have to make a chemically induced erection on the subjects. But they didn't, so they kept to the flaccid stretched length in their scientific report. So all news around the world (in the languages that I can understand) failed noticing this piece of information and then emphasised that stretching only worked for the flaccid length. (Cosmetical effect.) This doesn't exactly catch a big interest from most men then. I wondered whether the media and people in general are so conditioned to believe that one can't enhance the penis without surgery, that certain relevant information from the study became a blind spot in the eyes of the media.
Yes, even the most acknowledged urologist and male sexual health expert in my country claimed that stretching only increased flaccid length. I expect that authorities (in urology or male sexual health) all over the world have underestimated the potential for stretching and how it may increase the erect length.
And then there are economical interests; the pharmaceutical mafia that benefits economically from selling viagra and doesn't want people to know that penis exercises may drastically increase EQ. PEing means less money to them, and they may have a role regarding the urologists/male sexual health experts that claim that no naturla methods help.
Because of these reasons (and probably some more) I am not the least surprised that PEing isn't acknowledged globally yet. Though by the increasing number of individuals that discover PEing by themselves, I expect that suddeny it reaches a critical mass, and then all of sudden PEing is globally acknowledged. I don't expect it to happen in the next five years though.
And Andropenis wrote in their scientific report that although they expected that erect length also had increased in the test subjects, they hadn't scientifically measured erect length as it was difficult to obtain good erections under a clinical environment. If they should include erect length, they would have to make a chemically induced erection on the subjects. But they didn't, so they kept to the flaccid stretched length in their scientific report. So all news around the world (in the languages that I can understand) failed noticing this piece of information and then emphasised that stretching only worked for the flaccid length. (Cosmetical effect.) This doesn't exactly catch a big interest from most men then. I wondered whether the media and people in general are so conditioned to believe that one can't enhance the penis without surgery, that certain relevant information from the study became a blind spot in the eyes of the media.
Yes, even the most acknowledged urologist and male sexual health expert in my country claimed that stretching only increased flaccid length. I expect that authorities (in urology or male sexual health) all over the world have underestimated the potential for stretching and how it may increase the erect length.
And then there are economical interests; the pharmaceutical mafia that benefits economically from selling viagra and doesn't want people to know that penis exercises may drastically increase EQ. PEing means less money to them, and they may have a role regarding the urologists/male sexual health experts that claim that no naturla methods help.
Because of these reasons (and probably some more) I am not the least surprised that PEing isn't acknowledged globally yet. Though by the increasing number of individuals that discover PEing by themselves, I expect that suddeny it reaches a critical mass, and then all of sudden PEing is globally acknowledged. I don't expect it to happen in the next five years though.
Comment