This has probably been asked before at some point and I don't want to betray laziness but I feel like I'd rather just ask this than search around. Let me start off by saying that I subscribe to the belief that the most important thing women look for in a man is not any dimension or single quality but the guy as a whole. I get it. And I look for girls (that I want to seriously date) with the same metric, and I'd imagine most guys do too, as well.
That being said. What would you say is the better deal here:
A guy with an fairly above average sized cock but a rather average face and body... nothing special at all in those departments, but nowhere near "UGLY."
OR
A guy with an average to slightly below average sized cock with a rather well built and sexy body and also relatively good looking.
Everything else is equal... good personality, funny, etc.
What is the better deal? On the flip side would be a woman w/ a great body but average to not great face vs a woman with a poor body (maybe a little overweight and out of proportion or something) and a rather cute and sexy face. Not exactly the same but you get the idea...
Just wondering! Not trying to objectify people and their assets just curious.
That being said. What would you say is the better deal here:
A guy with an fairly above average sized cock but a rather average face and body... nothing special at all in those departments, but nowhere near "UGLY."
OR
A guy with an average to slightly below average sized cock with a rather well built and sexy body and also relatively good looking.
Everything else is equal... good personality, funny, etc.
What is the better deal? On the flip side would be a woman w/ a great body but average to not great face vs a woman with a poor body (maybe a little overweight and out of proportion or something) and a rather cute and sexy face. Not exactly the same but you get the idea...
Just wondering! Not trying to objectify people and their assets just curious.

Comment