Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The G-spot doesn't exist again.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The G-spot doesn't exist again.

    Bad news from the world of Science: the g spot is fictional.

    Unfortunately Science has a bad rep when it comes to this sort of thing, having previously denied the female orgasm entirely. Hell, for two weeks in 1973 a team of Harvard Sciencers briefly thought women didn't exist at all, until an unlikely janitor from the wrong side of the tracks disproved the theory with a picture of his mum. And that janitor's name? Albert Einstein.

    So anyway, the g-spot thing. This seems like bad news for everyone working towards a length that can poke a woman just-so in that magical vaginal Narnia. It's all about the clitoris apparently, which... I don't entirely buy. Of course it matters, but plenty of people have that personal experience of orgasm by a circuitous route. For me it was an ex who was thoroughly into having her nipples teased during sex, leading to epic bed shaking orgasms that put her in some sort of sex coma. Once she told me off for it, accusing me of slacking off and using them as a sort of orgasm cheat code. She wasn't wrong.

    I'm getting off track again.

    Women of PEgym: have you got cast iron (anecdotal) proof of the incredible vaginal bigfoot, perhaps walking off slowly into the woods in shaky, grainy video, or has the work of some ropey italian sexologists cast a light on a long held suspicion that all your female friends are filthy stinking liars out to make your vagina look bad?

    And will you be cancelling your Cosmo subscription?
    Started 28/12/2014 BPEL - 6.5" EG - 5.5" FL ~4" FG ~4"
    27/8/2015 BPEL - 7.5" BEG 5.75" MEG 5.6" FL ~5.5" FG ~4.5"
    Current 26/12/2015 BPEL - 7.7" BEG 5.9" MEG 5.6" FL ~5.5" FG ~4.5"

    Goals - EQ and Stamina BPEL 7.5" MEG 5.8"

  • #2
    I don't think you will find a woman who will support their findings.
    Going an inch and 1/2 deeper than before

    Comment


    • #3
      Oh well... there's still the A spot, the cul-de-sac, the U spot, and the clitoris.. who needs a G spot anyway? Bahahaha
      You never slow down, you never grow old!

      Comment


      • #4
        That article seems to disagree with the findings.
        Going an inch and 1/2 deeper than before

        Comment


        • #5
          I am trying to avoid the Bald spot.
          I just shave my head.
          Valued Member of 11 years at the TheBiohacker
          Looks are deceiving, mirrors don't lie.

          Comment


          • #6
            No G spot? Don't tell my wife cause I've been short stroking it for along time to our mutual delight. Her's luckily is right at the entrance of her vagina where even my tongue can get her off. Multi orgasmic is she, a jewel among jewels
            A prayer, is kinda the same as a "Like". If there are enough likes, God will take notice. So "Like" away please. My daughter needs your prayers. Thank You.

            Comment


            • #7
              Please don't tell me my wife has been faking it all these years!
              To totally satisfy a woman sexually is not about having a large penis, it's about being a good lover.

              Comment


              • #8
                I am going to keep rubbing the rough, roughly quarter dollar shaped area approximately 2-3 inches into the vaginal canal just in case. I would not want to be accused of fearing Bigfoot.
                ALL THE WAY WITH GOOD OLE JAY!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Cough's Bulls@#$t.

                  That being said its one of my favorite techniques to use on my Bride.

                  Massaging a lady's G Spot is a also a Great Accelerant to get her to the promised land!
                  “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything” Albert Einstein

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    As the op states "sexperts" have a long history of being plain wrong.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Pegasus View Post
                      As the op states "sexperts" have a long history of being plain wrong.
                      Any study from 1973... seriously?

                      " for two weeks in 1973 a team of Harvard Sciencers "
                      “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything” Albert Einstein

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Lots of studies the article links to ... oh wait.



                        What rubbish.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by akaTrex View Post
                          Any study from 1973... seriously?

                          " for two weeks in 1973 a team of Harvard Sciencers "
                          BRB, calling Guinness. I think I'm a shoe-in for longest vertical distance between a joke and a head.

                          Hello? Yes I was calling about the joke... 5.8 miles. Hm? Oh that is a shame.

                          Apparently the record is held by one A.Hitler, something about a piece of paper and peace in our time, whatever that is.

                          So er, seriously? No. Not seriously. Albert Einstein wasn't a young Harvard janitor in 1973, seeing as he'd been dead for 18 years, and at no point did scientists think women didn't exist. Also what I was doing there was aping the plot of Good Will Hunting.
                          Started 28/12/2014 BPEL - 6.5" EG - 5.5" FL ~4" FG ~4"
                          27/8/2015 BPEL - 7.5" BEG 5.75" MEG 5.6" FL ~5.5" FG ~4.5"
                          Current 26/12/2015 BPEL - 7.7" BEG 5.9" MEG 5.6" FL ~5.5" FG ~4.5"

                          Goals - EQ and Stamina BPEL 7.5" MEG 5.8"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Here is the short on their work it is published 2014. Load of crap of course I remember stuff like this coming out back in the day from a female researcher . Her work was not replicated and she was rubbished by scientists and stats people . Her work was popular at one time with lay people, especially the militant feminists .
                            Quote
                            • clitoris;
                            • clitoral complex;
                            • G-spot;
                            • vaginal orgasm;
                            • female sexual function;
                            • G-spot amplification

                            Sexual medicine experts and sexologists must spread certainties on the biological basis of the female orgasm to all women, not hypotheses or personal opinions. Therefore, they must use scientific anatomical terminology. The anatomy of the clitoris and the female orgasm are described in textbooks, but some researchers have proposed a new anatomical terminology for the sexual response in women. The internal/inner clitoris does not exist: the entire clitoris is an external organ. The clitoris is not composed of two arcs but of the glans, body, and crura or roots. “Clitoral bulbs” is an incorrect term from an embryological and anatomical viewpoint: the correct term is “vestibular bulbs.” The bulbocavernosus muscles are implicated in inferior vaginismus, while the pubovaginal muscle is responsible for superior vaginismus. The clitoral or clitoris-urethro-vaginal complex has no embryological, anatomical and physiological support: the vagina has no anatomical relationship with the clitoris, and the clitoris is a perineal organ while the supposed G-spot is in the pelvic urethra. G-spot/vaginal/clitoral orgasm, vaginally activated orgasm, and clitorally activated orgasm, are incorrect terms: like “male orgasm,” “female orgasm” is the correct term. The “vaginal” orgasm that some women report is always caused by the surrounding erectile organs (triggers of female orgasm). The male penis cannot come in contact with the venous plexus of Kobelt or with the clitoris during vaginal intercourse. Also, female ejaculation, premature ejaculation, persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD), periurethral glans, vaginal–cervical genitosensory component of the vagus nerve, and G-spot amplification, are terms without scientific basis. Female sexual satisfaction is based on orgasm and resolution: in all women, orgasm is always possible if the female erectile organs, i.e. the female penis, are effectively stimulated during masturbation, cunnilingus, partner masturbation, or during vaginal/anal intercourse if the clitoris is simply stimulated with a finger. Clin. Anat., 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
                            Unquote

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by elijohnson View Post
                              BRB, calling Guinness. I think I'm a shoe-in for longest vertical distance between a joke and a head.

                              Hello? Yes I was calling about the joke... 5.8 miles. Hm? Oh that is a shame.

                              Apparently the record is held by one A.Hitler, something about a piece of paper and peace in our time, whatever that is.

                              So er, seriously? No. Not seriously. Albert Einstein wasn't a young Harvard janitor in 1973, seeing as he'd been dead for 18 years, and at no point did scientists think women didn't exist. Also what I was doing there was aping the plot of Good Will Hunting.
                              Why IKE Why?

                              Wazzock
                              “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything” Albert Einstein

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X