Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

African Penis...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Wishful10x8 View Post
    What Does Science Say About Average Penis Sizes From Around The World? | IFLScience

    The information you are spouting is wrong. One way it is wrong is giving flaccid lengths for Asians. It is not as they want you to believe. The company putting that out is trying to shame Americans and Europians to sell us enlargement devices.

    Many areas in Africa hang rocks from their penis. Getting so large they can't have sex. India has a sect that does the same. Walking the streets with boulders hanging. China has a following of penis hanging as a martial art. We promote hanging. The difference being we say condition for it and then do it safely so your penis stays functional. Being able to have sex is very important to us. If you want to follow the practices of those sects go ahead. If you get a 20binch penis that doesn't work, 5hen I wish you happiness.
    Citations please?
    Sex is the great leveler, taste the great divider. - Pauline Kael

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Stoneblade View Post
      When Viagra and Cialis fails you from over-use, the only sure way to ensure an erection is to inject 1 ml of 20 mcg Caverject or 30/1 Bimix directly into the base of the penis will make your penis like concrete for a few hours.
      Yeh I actually heard about that, some female pornstar was bitching about it on twitter, that it is very painful because the erections are so hard and that male talent are fucking up their dicks, because eventually that won't work either.

      Comment


      • #48
        You guys couldn't wait three weeks to be racist could you? Where's your holiday spirit?
        Sex is the great leveler, taste the great divider. - Pauline Kael

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Holm View Post
          Like I've said previously, the article shows no data for the global studies.

          Factors I think are critical to be able to judge the reported measurement:
          - Age of subjects
          - Methodology (e.g. bone-pressed, drug induced erections, self-reporting)
          - Sample size
          - If the measurements were conducted in adjunction to a medical treatment

          None of this is presented.
          You do realize that in addition to the written article, a detailed report is presented to reviewers and publisher, which contains the granular detail of the article. This reports tends to be 300 pages some times more.

          The detail report is what gets reviewed...did you really think people get paid $3000 for writing 6 pages which can easily be fabricated?

          Secondly why do you believe those factor are at all critical? What ever bias you might argue based on those factors affects all parts of the study, which results in statistical noise which was accounted for by sample testing against the population and regression analysis.

          The report did indeed give a sample size 800 of which 200 white, 200 black. It looked at both self-reported and a consistent objective measurement independently.

          If you don't believe this article, why don't you present an equally authentic scientific journal article which corroborates your opinions?

          I find it funny how white men jump when a claim is made that that black men are bigger, but all they can do is criticize evidence without providing their own.

          Yet those same white men are proud of how much bigger they are than Asian men. Why not let go of your ego?

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Kent09 View Post
            Yeh I actually heard about that, some female pornstar was bitching about it on twitter, that it is very painful because the erections are so hard and that male talent are fucking up their dicks, because eventually that won't work either.
            Which pornstar was it? Who was she talking about? The gossip gets juicy....

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Stoneblade View Post
              Which pornstar was it? Who was she talking about? The gossip gets juicy....
              Can't remember, since I don't follow her, I just saw it being reweeted by some pornstar, and it's spammed too far down on my twitter now, gonna be impossible to find (was around 2-3 weeks ago or so, maybe more). She was mad and refused to work with male pornstars who do it lol.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Jay48 View Post
                If you use those Caverject shots too much don't you get Peyronie's disease? I heard that was a risk with those injections. Also, what black porn stars actually use that stuff? Maybe you're talking about people like Shane Diesel?
                It's very prevalent in porn. Speaking from a gay porn perspective at least. Trying to keep your dick hard 3-4 hours to get all the film required is exhausting. And Viagra or a similar for of pill is used on EVERY set. Viagra is only fully effective for about an hour maybe a bit more. So getting the film in during that window is a crap shoot sometimes. Guys who use these injections are sought out in the industry so it's a desirable and peer pressured thing if you want to make more money.
                Nov 2016 Start
                6.5 BPEL 5.5 MEG

                Jan 18, 2018
                7.625 BPEL 5.875 MEG

                Total PE:
                14 months
                +1.125" length +.325" girth

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Kent09 View Post
                  Can't remember, since I don't follow her, I just saw it being reweeted by some pornstar, and it's spammed too far down on my twitter now, gonna be impossible to find (was around 2-3 weeks ago or so, maybe more). She was mad and refused to work with male pornstars who do it lol.
                  In porn the struggle is real! Haha

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Stoneblade View Post
                    You do realize that in addition to the written article, a detailed report is presented to reviewers and publisher, which contains the granular detail of the article. This reports tends to be 300 pages some times more.
                    Any scientific (or academic) article is supposed to cite all it's references and give directions where to review its sources, or else it is considered invalid.

                    Originally posted by Stoneblade View Post
                    Secondly why do you believe those factor are at all critical? What ever bias you might argue based on those factors affects all parts of the study, which results in statistical noise which was accounted for by sample testing against the population and regression analysis.
                    Measuring people men under the age of 25 whom haven't reached their growth potential would skew numbers. Also, if the subjects are much older than 50 years old, their penis may naturally start to shrink. People being measured in adjunction with a medical condition, like priapism, or other urological conditions, would also skew numbers. For example.

                    Originally posted by Stoneblade View Post
                    If you don't believe this article, why don't you present an equally authentic scientific journal article which corroborates your opinions?
                    I'm not the one making the claims here. The burden of proof is on the side of the proclaimer.

                    Originally posted by Stoneblade View Post
                    I find it funny how white men jump when a claim is made that that black men are bigger, but all they can do is criticize evidence without providing their own.
                    Oh yeah, just like you jumped up and started screaming "racist" for me pointing out the scientifically proven and obvious fact that HIV and other STDs are more prevalent among blacks than whites.
                    Start, May '17: BPEL 7.2" x MSEG 5.5"
                    December '17: BPEL 8.1" x MSEG 5.9"
                    February '18: BPEL 8.2" x MSEG 5.75"

                    Long-term goal: BPEL 8.5" x MSEG 6.25"

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Holm View Post
                      Any scientific (or academic) article is supposed to cite all it's references and give directions where to review its sources, or else it is considered invalid.

                      Measuring people men under the age of 25 whom haven't reached their growth potential would skew numbers. Also, if the subjects are much older than 50 years old, their penis may naturally start to shrink. People being measured in ad junction with a medical condition, like priapism, or other urological conditions, would also skew numbers. For example.

                      I'm not the one making the claims here. The burden of proof is on the side of the proclaimer.

                      Oh yeah, just like you jumped up and started screaming "racist" for me pointing out the scientifically proven and obvious fact that HIV and other STDs are more prevalent among blacks than whites.

                      I had pointed your "racist" behavior, because it was nowhere relevant to the topic at hand.

                      Actually the burden of proof lies with you if you claim that I'm wrong and cannot prove it. You're using a classic Straw-man fallacy. You are making a claim. You're clearly proclaiming that the article is inaccurate.

                      The onus of providing evidence, if I claim a particular size, does indeed lie with me, and I have provided the evidence. It's just that you refute the evidence. If you refute someones evidence then you have to provide your own evidence as to why your opinions are correct. Until then all you can say is that you cannot verify or falsify my findings.

                      If you really believe that all scientific source information should be available to the public, why don't you go find me the source data used for the FDA testing of Nexiam, a commonly known patented drug? If you can provide that then your argument is correct, if you fail then your argument fails also. While you're at it you can also try to find the original source data that was used to form the Van der Waals equation?

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by MisterBator View Post
                        It's very prevalent in porn. Speaking from a gay porn perspective at least. Trying to keep your dick hard 3-4 hours to get all the film required is exhausting. And Viagra or a similar for of pill is used on EVERY set. Viagra is only fully effective for about an hour maybe a bit more. So getting the film in during that window is a crap shoot sometimes. Guys who use these injections are sought out in the industry so it's a desirable and peer pressured thing if you want to make more money.
                        So you tellin me these blacj actors especially have a 7 o clock erection despite being on viagra?

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Road28 View Post
                          So you tellin me these blacj actors especially have a 7 o clock erection despite being on viagra?
                          Could you try to reword this? The grammar is so bad I'm fumbling to understand your question.
                          Nov 2016 Start
                          6.5 BPEL 5.5 MEG

                          Jan 18, 2018
                          7.625 BPEL 5.875 MEG

                          Total PE:
                          14 months
                          +1.125" length +.325" girth

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by MisterBator View Post
                            Could you try to reword this? The grammar is so bad I'm fumbling to understand your question.
                            So are you saying that black actors have a 7 o'clock erection angle despite being on viagra?

                            Youd think the viagra would put tham at at least 8 or 9 o clock tbg

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Lol this is probaly the most ignorant forum I've seen on this site smh.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Stoneblade View Post
                                Who ever said that I have a PhD? In fact I have Dsc awarded by the University of Florida. Secondly I was being sarcastic about not knowing about the STD's, I can't be believe how stupid you are to assume you've told me anything I didn't already know.

                                The article you've presented' for me at least looks at too old a population, and didn't look at erect length. Further more the average of 13.4 cm is still higher than the American average of 12.9 cm as outlined in a far more reputable and DETAILED peer reviewed scientific article, as linked below.

                                https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.w...opulations.pdf

                                This paper had also compared 200 white males in New York with 200 black males in New York, and found that black men were on average 2 cm or 0.8" larger

                                This article is published by Elsevier, the leading publisher of scientific journals

                                As to your ancestors, they were all retards, mine were Dutch, with many of them being well over 2 m tall.
                                And the 10 to 12 inch penises are where in this study?

                                What about my Dutch ancestors?
                                ALL THE WAY WITH GOOD OLE JAY!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X