Many people will die from C19 - quite probably at a much higher rate than the flu.
More would have died if we weren't all forcibly sequestered - though it's now clear that it wouldn't have been anywhere near as many as a "they" said it would be.
I don't know anyone who would dispute those two claims yet. But the fundamental breakdown is that we were presented with a false dichotomy: Do nothing and many people die or; Collapse the economy and save lives. There was no measured approach based on a study of meaningful data, weighing the cost of people dying against the cost of decimated economy. Jobless claims in the US are nearing 22M in a single month and the effects of these shutdowns are far-reaching and will have very serious long-term consequences that will require years to recover from. The governors and mayors will say, "We're all in this together guys so, I know you're unemployed and can't pay rent now but, 'we' saved lives and I made that happen so vote for me again".
More would have died if we weren't all forcibly sequestered - though it's now clear that it wouldn't have been anywhere near as many as a "they" said it would be.
I don't know anyone who would dispute those two claims yet. But the fundamental breakdown is that we were presented with a false dichotomy: Do nothing and many people die or; Collapse the economy and save lives. There was no measured approach based on a study of meaningful data, weighing the cost of people dying against the cost of decimated economy. Jobless claims in the US are nearing 22M in a single month and the effects of these shutdowns are far-reaching and will have very serious long-term consequences that will require years to recover from. The governors and mayors will say, "We're all in this together guys so, I know you're unemployed and can't pay rent now but, 'we' saved lives and I made that happen so vote for me again".


Comment