Question does not mean what size you would like to have, but what shape you would like your shaft to be.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Preferred shaft shape
Collapse
X
-
Preferred shaft shape
38larger at the base then tapering toward glans28.95%11larger in the middle then base or near glans7.89%3larger at the glans and tapering toward base5.26%2same size from base to glans57.89%22FL 6.0"/MFG 5.75", BPEL 7.00"/MEG 6.5"
The Ultimate Jelq (The UJ)
The Ultimate V (The UV)
Testicle Jelq (The TJ)
Heated Bundled LAS
Ultimate Warmup ExerciseTags: None
-
I voted for tapering towards the base, but I mean a slight taper. I would like it fairly uniform, but the slight taper I think would help with penetration especially if I am a bit girthy which is my goal. I'm not now, but god willing I will be.
-
-
I voted for being larger at the base and tapering toward my glans. One advantage for a guy with a lot of girth is that being smaller near the top makes penetration a little easier.FL 6.0"/MFG 5.75", BPEL 7.00"/MEG 6.5"
The Ultimate Jelq (The UJ)
The Ultimate V (The UV)
Testicle Jelq (The TJ)
Heated Bundled LAS
Ultimate Warmup Exercise
Comment
-
I went tapering from base to glans, but only slightly..Start: 11/2013: BPEL: 4.73" MEG: 4.5"
Best: BPEL: 7" MEG: 5.625"
Current:BPEL: 7" MEG: 5.5"
Comment
-
I'm currently working to modify mine a bit. I'm 5.75" MEG girth now & 5.25" flaccid, having just completed my first month of the cock ring Challenge. My girth went nuts as I added .5" to my MEG in one month; however, I got a bit of a "baseball bat" now, that I didn't have previously, so I'm doing some squeezes and LAS to build my base more than my MEG. I'm really satisfied with my MEG, might go for 6", but don't want to lose out on BJ's as a result of getting too big. Also focusing on expanding my glans a bit. I voted tapered from base to glans as my preferred shape. I just currently have a larger MEG. The GF loves it though, as she says it feels like she's clockin' too much speed over a series of "speed-bumps" when I'm in jackhammer mode!
(LOL) Cool thing is, when she's locking her "grip" on me during sex, I can really feel the "speedbumps" too, so it's all GOOD!
Last edited by jockinthebox; 06-20-2015, 12:55 PM.
Comment
-
Before starting PE I was 'larger at base tapering towards glands.' Now after about 7 weeks of PE I still have a larger base, but that is only due to my CS becoming very large at the base. Because after PE it seems that my non-base CC portions have all gained much faster than the base CC, so it looks basically even. (note: my base CC did get gains as well, just now the differences in between the base CC portion and the other portions of the CC are not noticeably much different looking in size anymore)
my vote would be 'larger base tapering towards glands.' Maybe that's biased because that's what I technically have. But it's more or less for the same reason as OP's. As long as the 'tapering' isn't that massive of a difference visually, then it's okay, if it is noticeably much smaller and makes the penis look weird and skinny towards the base then I'd say one that is the same size throughout the base-head glands would look nicer.
On more note. :/ Don't mean to offend but... I'd say if the penis is 6 inches in length, then the larger base tapering towards head would look fine. But if it is like 5 1/2 inches in length I'd say the best look would be same size throughout the whole shaft. Also, another factor (in my opinion) would be the size of the girth. If the penis is already naturally smaller girth, same size girth throughout shaft would in my opinion look and be the best (or with a .15-.2 as max difference throughout the shaft). Okay, all in all, any of them are fine (yet I prefer tree trunk shape the most) as long as the difference isn't hugely significant to make it visually look SUPER noticeable the whole time.Gains so far: +2 BPEL and +1.2 EG !
Comment
-
I'm assuming the OP was POLLING for ERECT as opposed to flaccid, so that's the way I answered earlier and voted; however, mine's significantly different flaccid vs. erect. When flaccid mine's almost completely cylindrical base to glans, when I'm erect my MEG expands more than my base, always has, even beforee PE. I've always assumed that was true of other guys, but now I wonder? Does your cock expand equally or uniformly from base to glans when erect? Mine doesn't as I get considerably more expansion mid-girth towards the head than from mid to base. Anyone else???
Comment
-
-
I went for the same shape as mine, cos mine's great
"I want to go to my death bed one day knowing that even when my heart led me into the fire, I fucking did it anyway, and I have the story to tell."
Everything I know about Premature Ejaculation
Your dick is almost certainly big enough. Relax
Comment
-
Pre-PE I had slight taper from base to glans and it expanded uniformly. Now I still have a larger base girth, but my meg has gained more so than the rest of the shaft. So I get kind of a football shape to it. It's not extreme or anything, but the meg has gained more than the base or glans. I believe this is from the compression squeezes.Originally posted by jockinthebox View PostI'm assuming the OP was POLLING for ERECT as opposed to flaccid, so that's the way I answered earlier and voted; however, mine's significantly different flaccid vs. erect. When flaccid mine's almost completely cylindrical base to glans, when I'm erect my MEG expands more than my base, always has, even beforee PE. I've always assumed that was true of other guys, but now I wonder? Does your cock expand equally or uniformly from base to glans when erect? Mine doesn't as I get considerably more expansion mid-girth towards the head than from mid to base. Anyone else???
Comment
-
Makes sense LBM, but i'm not 100% sure my "football" shape is entirely a result of any PE. As I said before, I've always expanded more MEG than at my base or even my glans, although my head expansion is almost as much as my mid-girth expansion. It's my base to mid-shaft that doesn't expand as much. It's not so odd in appearence though, since I only expand MEG 1/2" over my flaccid mid-girth (from 5.25" flaccid to 5.75" erect). I'm a "shower" and not a "grower", so it's not as drastic a difference as it would be for a "grower" guy, I'm guessing.Originally posted by lilbigman View PostPre-PE I had slight taper from base to glans and it expanded uniformly. Now I still have a larger base girth, but my meg has gained more so than the rest of the shaft. So I get kind of a football shape to it. It's not extreme or anything, but the meg has gained more than the base or glans. I believe this is from the compression squeezes.Last edited by jockinthebox; 06-21-2015, 08:51 AM.
Comment
-
Great question and its mors or less the ultimate stage of PE to not grow at all cost into all directions but to sculpt a shape.Originally posted by rbi99 View PostQuestion does not mean what size you would like to have, but what shape you would like your shaft to be.
Im naturally thicker mseg, espacially wider. My base has more depth but not nearly enough. I aim to get that through your UJ's!
A taper towards the glans is IMO the best shape for intercourse with a Woman. Espacially when you PE'd your dick to a borderline too big size.
You can with a taper stretch a vagina cm for cm until she can take the whole girth. Would be harder the other way around. BJ even more so.
Comment
-
Tapered down from base to glans. Let's you tease your partner with your smaller glans and slowly increase the pressure against her vagina walls as you slowly slide it in until she gets the full effect of your fatter base girth.Valued Member of 12+ years at the PEGym12/'09 (start) NBP EL - 4.5, EG - 4.4
12/11 NBPEL - 5.1, MSEG - 5
01/13 NBPEL - 5.35, MSEG - 5.1
01/14 NBPEL - 5.35, MSEG - 5.25
01/16 NBPEL - 5.4, MSEG - 5.5
Fat Pad = 1+/-
Real cars have two seats. Everything else is a bus.
Comment

Member of the Month Nov 2017
Comment